Congo vs Zambia: Real agricultural GDP growth rates
Real agricultural GDP growth rates over time
- Congo
- Zambia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 8.4% against 7.7% in Zambia, a difference of 0.7%.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 24 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 9th and Zambia ranks 12th of 46 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 5 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.0% | 1.0% | 3.0% | Congo |
| 1970s | 3.2% | 2.2% | 1.0% | Congo |
| 1980s | 4.2% | 3.5% | 0.6% | Congo |
| 1990s | -1.1% | 5.1% | 6.2% | Zambia |
| 2000s | 4.9% | 1.8% | 3.1% | Congo |
| 2010s | 7.3% | 7.1% | 0.2% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher real agricultural gdp growth rates, Congo or Zambia?
- Congo, at 8.4% against 7.7% in Zambia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in real agricultural gdp growth rates between Congo and Zambia?
- 0.7%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zambia?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2011.
- How do Congo and Zambia rank globally for real agricultural gdp growth rates?
- Congo ranks 9th and Zambia ranks 12th of 46 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank country economists, published as Real agricultural GDP growth rates (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This is the annual rate of growth of agricultural GDP. Value added in agriculture measures the output of the agricultural sector (ISIC divisions 1-5) less the value of intermediate inputs. Agriculture comprises value added from forestry, hunting, and fishing as well as cultivation of crops and livestock production. Value added is the net output of a sector after adding up all outputs and subtracting intermediate inputs. It is calculated without making deductions for depreciation of fabricated assets or depletion and degradation of natural resources. The industrial origin of value added is determined by the International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC), revision 2. Data are in current local currency.