San Marino vs Sweden: Readiness score, Social
Readiness score, Social over time
- San Marino
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 0.6745 against 0.6552 in San Marino, a difference of 0.0193.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
San Marino ranks 12th and Sweden ranks 10th of 186 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | San Marino | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.6341 | 0.6829 | 0.0488 | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0.6577 | 0.6741 | 0.0164 | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher readiness score, social, San Marino or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 0.6745 against 0.6552 in San Marino as of 2024.
- What is the difference in readiness score, social between San Marino and Sweden?
- 0.0193, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Sweden?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do San Marino and Sweden rank globally for readiness score, social?
- San Marino ranks 12th and Sweden ranks 10th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Readiness score, Social. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ND-GAIN index is a global free open-source index, that measures a country’s current vulnerability to climate disruptions and assesses a country’s readiness to leverage private and public sector investment for adaptive actions. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN index is an adaptation of the original index, adjusted by IMF staff to replace the Doing Business (DB) Index, used as source data in the original ND-GAIN, because the DB database has been discontinued by the World Bank in 2020 and it is no longer allowed in IMF work. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN is an interim solution offered by IMF staff until the ND-GAIN compilers will review the methodology and replace the DB index.