Colombia vs Qatar: Readiness score, Social
Readiness score, Social over time
- Colombia
- Qatar
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 0.2951 against 0.2924 in Qatar, a difference of 0.0027.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 118th and Qatar ranks 121st of 186 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.2788 | 0.236 | 0.0428 | Colombia |
| 2020s | 0.2911 | 0.2893 | 0.0018 | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher readiness score, social, Colombia or Qatar?
- Colombia, at 0.2951 against 0.2924 in Qatar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in readiness score, social between Colombia and Qatar?
- 0.0027, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Qatar?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Colombia and Qatar rank globally for readiness score, social?
- Colombia ranks 118th and Qatar ranks 121st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Readiness score, Social. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ND-GAIN index is a global free open-source index, that measures a country’s current vulnerability to climate disruptions and assesses a country’s readiness to leverage private and public sector investment for adaptive actions. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN index is an adaptation of the original index, adjusted by IMF staff to replace the Doing Business (DB) Index, used as source data in the original ND-GAIN, because the DB database has been discontinued by the World Bank in 2020 and it is no longer allowed in IMF work. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN is an interim solution offered by IMF staff until the ND-GAIN compilers will review the methodology and replace the DB index.