Andorra vs Croatia: Readiness score, Social
Readiness score, Social over time
- Andorra
- Croatia
How they compare
Andorra currently reports 0.4525 against 0.4495 in Croatia, a difference of 0.003.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Croatia ahead.
Andorra ranks 46th and Croatia ranks 49th of 186 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Andorra | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.305 | 0.4519 | 0.1469 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 0.3991 | 0.4475 | 0.0484 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher readiness score, social, Andorra or Croatia?
- Andorra, at 0.4525 against 0.4495 in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in readiness score, social between Andorra and Croatia?
- 0.003, with Andorra ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Andorra and Croatia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Andorra and Croatia rank globally for readiness score, social?
- Andorra ranks 46th and Croatia ranks 49th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Readiness score, Social. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ND-GAIN index is a global free open-source index, that measures a country’s current vulnerability to climate disruptions and assesses a country’s readiness to leverage private and public sector investment for adaptive actions. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN index is an adaptation of the original index, adjusted by IMF staff to replace the Doing Business (DB) Index, used as source data in the original ND-GAIN, because the DB database has been discontinued by the World Bank in 2020 and it is no longer allowed in IMF work. The IMF-adapted ND-GAIN is an interim solution offered by IMF staff until the ND-GAIN compilers will review the methodology and replace the DB index.