Lithuania vs Switzerland: R&D personnel in the business enterprise sector by main activity

Lithuania
5,518 Persons (full-time equivalent)
in 2023
Switzerland
58,899 Persons (full-time equivalent)
in 2023
Lithuania rank
10th
Switzerland rank
13th

R&D personnel in the business enterprise sector by main activity over time

  • Lithuania
  • Switzerland
020.0k40.0k60.0k200820152023

How they compare

Switzerland currently reports 58,899 Persons (full-time equivalent) against 5,518 Persons (full-time equivalent) in Lithuania, a difference of 53,381 Persons (full-time equivalent).

That makes Switzerland's figure about 10.7 times Lithuania's.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.

Lithuania ranks 10th and Switzerland ranks 13th of 12 countries.

Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Switzerland Difference Ahead
2000s 1,944 Persons (full-time equivalent) 39,832 Persons (full-time equivalent) 37,888 Persons (full-time equivalent) Switzerland
2010s 3,270 Persons (full-time equivalent) 49,271 Persons (full-time equivalent) 46,001 Persons (full-time equivalent) Switzerland
2020s 5,598 Persons (full-time equivalent) 56,505 Persons (full-time equivalent) 50,907 Persons (full-time equivalent) Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher r&d personnel in the business enterprise sector by main activity, Lithuania or Switzerland?
Switzerland, at 58,899 Persons (full-time equivalent) against 5,518 Persons (full-time equivalent) in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in r&d personnel in the business enterprise sector by main activity between Lithuania and Switzerland?
53,381 Persons (full-time equivalent), with Switzerland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Switzerland?
7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and Switzerland rank globally for r&d personnel in the business enterprise sector by main activity?
Lithuania ranks 10th and Switzerland ranks 13th of 12 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as R&D personnel in the business enterprise sector by main activity — R&D Personnel (total economy). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Switzerland: R&D personnel in the business enterprise sector by main activity. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/r-and-d-personnel-in-the-business-enterprise-sector-by-main-activity-r-and-d-personnel/lithuania-2/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/r-and-d-personnel-in-the-business-enterprise-sector-by-main-activity-r-and-d-personnel/lithuania-2/switzerland/">Lithuania vs Switzerland: R&D personnel in the business enterprise sector by main activity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
R&D personnel in the business enterprise sector by main activity — R&D Personnel (total economy)
Unit
Persons (full-time equivalent)
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
40 places, 587 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

This table presents research and development (R&D) statistics on personnel in the business enterprise sector. Measured in full-time equivalent are the number of total R&D personnel and researchers in the business enterprise sector by industry according to the International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC) revision 4. Data at the industry level are presented from 2000, first year from which some countries converted their data from ISIC rev.3.1 to the current ISIC rev. 4 classification.