Germany vs Chinese Taipei: R&D personnel in the business enterprise sector by main activity

Germany
543,452 Persons (full-time equivalent)
in 2023
Chinese Taipei
243,658 Persons (full-time equivalent)
in 2023
Germany rank
2nd
Chinese Taipei rank
4th

R&D personnel in the business enterprise sector by main activity over time

  • Germany
  • Chinese Taipei
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k200020112023

How they compare

Germany currently reports 543,452 Persons (full-time equivalent) against 243,658 Persons (full-time equivalent) in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 299,794 Persons (full-time equivalent).

That makes Germany's figure about 2.2 times Chinese Taipei's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.

Germany ranks 2nd and Chinese Taipei ranks 4th of 28 countries.

Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Chinese Taipei Difference Ahead
2000s 320,780 Persons (full-time equivalent) 117,249 Persons (full-time equivalent) 203,531 Persons (full-time equivalent) Germany
2010s 397,500 Persons (full-time equivalent) 181,891 Persons (full-time equivalent) 215,608 Persons (full-time equivalent) Germany
2020s 496,342 Persons (full-time equivalent) 230,115 Persons (full-time equivalent) 266,227 Persons (full-time equivalent) Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher r&d personnel in the business enterprise sector by main activity, Germany or Chinese Taipei?
Germany, at 543,452 Persons (full-time equivalent) against 243,658 Persons (full-time equivalent) in Chinese Taipei as of 2023.
What is the difference in r&d personnel in the business enterprise sector by main activity between Germany and Chinese Taipei?
299,794 Persons (full-time equivalent), with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Chinese Taipei?
18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Germany and Chinese Taipei rank globally for r&d personnel in the business enterprise sector by main activity?
Germany ranks 2nd and Chinese Taipei ranks 4th of 28 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as R&D personnel in the business enterprise sector by main activity — R&D Personnel (total economy). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Chinese Taipei: R&D personnel in the business enterprise sector by main activity. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/r-and-d-personnel-in-the-business-enterprise-sector-by-main-activity-r-and-d-personnel/germany/taiwan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/r-and-d-personnel-in-the-business-enterprise-sector-by-main-activity-r-and-d-personnel/germany/taiwan/">Germany vs Chinese Taipei: R&D personnel in the business enterprise sector by main activity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
R&D personnel in the business enterprise sector by main activity — R&D Personnel (total economy)
Unit
Persons (full-time equivalent)
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
40 places, 587 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

This table presents research and development (R&D) statistics on personnel in the business enterprise sector. Measured in full-time equivalent are the number of total R&D personnel and researchers in the business enterprise sector by industry according to the International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC) revision 4. Data at the industry level are presented from 2000, first year from which some countries converted their data from ISIC rev.3.1 to the current ISIC rev. 4 classification.