Italy vs Russian Federation: R&D Environmental Protection, Recurrent (general government)
R&D Environmental Protection, Recurrent (general government) over time
- Italy
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Italy currently reports 851 million SLC against 840.04 million SLC in Russian Federation, a difference of 10.96 million SLC.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 5th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 635.8 million SLC | 593.32 million SLC | 42.48 million SLC | Italy |
| 2020s | 679 million SLC | 836.34 million SLC | 157.34 million SLC | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher r&d environmental protection, recurrent (general government), Italy or Russian Federation?
- Italy, at 851 million SLC against 840.04 million SLC in Russian Federation as of 2023.
- What is the difference in r&d environmental protection, recurrent (general government) between Italy and Russian Federation?
- 10.96 million SLC, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Russian Federation?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2021.
- How do Italy and Russian Federation rank globally for r&d environmental protection, recurrent (general government)?
- Italy ranks 5th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as R&D Environmental Protection, Recurrent (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.