Mozambique vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): R&D Environmental Protection, Recurrent (central government)
R&D Environmental Protection, Recurrent (central government) over time
- Mozambique
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
How they compare
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) currently reports 337 million SLC against 307.95 million SLC in Mozambique, a difference of 29.05 million SLC.
That makes Netherlands (Kingdom of the)'s figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Netherlands (Kingdom of the) has been ahead every year.
Mozambique ranks 14th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 13th of 49 countries.
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Netherlands (Kingdom of the) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 49.62 million SLC | 93 million SLC | 43.38 million SLC | Netherlands (Kingdom of the) |
| 2020s | 158.82 million SLC | 306 million SLC | 147.18 million SLC | Netherlands (Kingdom of the) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher r&d environmental protection, recurrent (central government), Mozambique or Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the), at 337 million SLC against 307.95 million SLC in Mozambique as of 2023.
- What is the difference in r&d environmental protection, recurrent (central government) between Mozambique and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
- 29.05 million SLC, with Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
- How do Mozambique and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank globally for r&d environmental protection, recurrent (central government)?
- Mozambique ranks 14th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 13th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as R&D Environmental Protection, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.