Germany vs Italy: R&D Environmental Protection (general government expenditure) — Value
R&D Environmental Protection (general government expenditure) — Value over time
- Germany
- Italy
How they compare
Germany currently reports 1,967 million USD against 1,834 million USD in Italy, a difference of 133 million USD.
That makes Germany's figure about 1.1 times Italy's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Italy ahead.
Germany ranks 2nd and Italy ranks 3rd of 69 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 1 and Italy in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 805.38 million USD | 1,748 million USD | 942.86 million USD | Italy |
| 2010s | 1,364 million USD | 1,421 million USD | 57.47 million USD | Italy |
| 2020s | 1,811 million USD | 1,584 million USD | 226.58 million USD | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher r&d environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value, Germany or Italy?
- Germany, at 1,967 million USD against 1,834 million USD in Italy as of 2024.
- What is the difference in r&d environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value between Germany and Italy?
- 133 million USD, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Italy?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Germany and Italy rank globally for r&d environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value?
- Germany ranks 2nd and Italy ranks 3rd of 69 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as R&D Environmental Protection (general government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.