Belgium vs Norway: R&D Environmental Protection (general government expenditure) — Value
R&D Environmental Protection (general government expenditure) — Value over time
- Belgium
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 142.29 million USD against 97.81 million USD in Belgium, a difference of 44.48 million USD.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.5 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Norway ahead.
Belgium ranks 15th and Norway ranks 12th of 69 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.22 million USD | 99.75 million USD | 64.54 million USD | Norway |
| 2010s | 72.34 million USD | 277.75 million USD | 205.41 million USD | Norway |
| 2020s | 96.33 million USD | 137.1 million USD | 40.77 million USD | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher r&d environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value, Belgium or Norway?
- Norway, at 142.29 million USD against 97.81 million USD in Belgium as of 2024.
- What is the difference in r&d environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value between Belgium and Norway?
- 44.48 million USD, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Norway?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Norway rank globally for r&d environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value?
- Belgium ranks 15th and Norway ranks 12th of 69 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as R&D Environmental Protection (general government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.