Belgium vs Japan: R&D Environmental Protection (general government expenditure) — Value
R&D Environmental Protection (general government expenditure) — Value over time
- Belgium
- Japan
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 97.81 million USD against 83.99 million USD in Japan, a difference of 13.82 million USD.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.2 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Japan ahead.
Belgium ranks 15th and Japan ranks 17th of 69 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.2 million USD | 210.83 million USD | 159.62 million USD | Japan |
| 2010s | 72.34 million USD | 255.29 million USD | 182.96 million USD | Japan |
| 2020s | 96.33 million USD | 91.46 million USD | 4.87 million USD | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher r&d environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value, Belgium or Japan?
- Belgium, at 97.81 million USD against 83.99 million USD in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in r&d environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value between Belgium and Japan?
- 13.82 million USD, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Japan?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Japan rank globally for r&d environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value?
- Belgium ranks 15th and Japan ranks 17th of 69 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as R&D Environmental Protection (general government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.