Russian Federation vs Sweden: R&D Environmental Protection (general government expenditure) — Value

Russian Federation
840.04 million SLC
in 2021
Sweden
623 million SLC
in 2024
Russian Federation rank
14th
Sweden rank
16th

R&D Environmental Protection (general government expenditure) — Value over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Sweden
02004006008001.0k200120122024

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 840.04 million SLC against 623 million SLC in Sweden, a difference of 217.04 million SLC.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.3 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Sweden ahead.

Russian Federation ranks 14th and Sweden ranks 16th of 69 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 0 million SLC 269 million SLC 269 million SLC Sweden
2010s 601.62 million SLC 456.17 million SLC 145.45 million SLC Russian Federation
2020s 836.34 million SLC 559 million SLC 277.34 million SLC Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher r&d environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value, Russian Federation or Sweden?
Russian Federation, at 840.04 million SLC against 623 million SLC in Sweden as of 2021.
What is the difference in r&d environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value between Russian Federation and Sweden?
217.04 million SLC, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Sweden?
9 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
How do Russian Federation and Sweden rank globally for r&d environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value?
Russian Federation ranks 14th and Sweden ranks 16th of 69 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as R&D Environmental Protection (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs Sweden: R&D Environmental Protection (general government expenditure) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/r-and-d-environmental-protection-general-government-expenditure-value-standard-local/russian-federation-2/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/r-and-d-environmental-protection-general-government-expenditure-value-standard-local/russian-federation-2/sweden/">Russian Federation vs Sweden: R&D Environmental Protection (general government expenditure) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
R&D Environmental Protection (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
72 places, 1,238 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.