Pakistan vs Türkiye: R&D Environmental Protection (general government expenditure) — Value
R&D Environmental Protection (general government expenditure) — Value over time
- Pakistan
- Türkiye
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 51,631 million SLC against 747 million SLC in Türkiye, a difference of 50,884 million SLC.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 69.1 times Türkiye's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Pakistan ranks 2nd and Türkiye ranks 1st of 69 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9,538 million SLC | 148.42 million SLC | 9,390 million SLC | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 31,888 million SLC | 490.71 million SLC | 31,397 million SLC | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher r&d environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value, Pakistan or Türkiye?
- Pakistan, at 51,631 million SLC against 747 million SLC in Türkiye as of 2024.
- What is the difference in r&d environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value between Pakistan and Türkiye?
- 50,884 million SLC, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Türkiye?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2024.
- How do Pakistan and Türkiye rank globally for r&d environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value?
- Pakistan ranks 2nd and Türkiye ranks 1st of 69 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as R&D Environmental Protection (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.