Germany vs Norway: R&D Environmental Protection (general government expenditure) — Value
R&D Environmental Protection (general government expenditure) — Value over time
- Germany
- Norway
How they compare
Germany currently reports 1,817 million SLC against 1,529 million SLC in Norway, a difference of 288 million SLC.
That makes Germany's figure about 1.2 times Norway's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Germany ahead.
Germany ranks 8th and Norway ranks 10th of 69 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 655.89 million SLC | 635 million SLC | 20.89 million SLC | Germany |
| 2010s | 1,122 million SLC | 1,804 million SLC | 682 million SLC | Norway |
| 2020s | 1,664 million SLC | 1,353 million SLC | 311 million SLC | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher r&d environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value, Germany or Norway?
- Germany, at 1,817 million SLC against 1,529 million SLC in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in r&d environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value between Germany and Norway?
- 288 million SLC, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Norway?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Germany and Norway rank globally for r&d environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value?
- Germany ranks 8th and Norway ranks 10th of 69 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as R&D Environmental Protection (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.