Georgia vs Kyrgyzstan: R&D Environmental Protection (central government expenditure) — Value
R&D Environmental Protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time
- Georgia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0.01 million USD against 0 million USD in Georgia, a difference of 0.01 million USD.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Georgia ranks 63rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 61st of 101 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5067 million USD | 0.22 million USD | 0.2867 million USD | Georgia |
| 2010s | 0.056 million USD | 0.082 million USD | 0.026 million USD | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 0 million USD | 0.018 million USD | 0.018 million USD | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher r&d environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Georgia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 0.01 million USD against 0 million USD in Georgia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in r&d environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Georgia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.01 million USD, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for r&d environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
- Georgia ranks 63rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 61st of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as R&D Environmental Protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.