Pakistan vs United Republic of Tanzania: R&D Environmental Protection (central government expenditure) — Value

Pakistan
13,509 million SLC
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
845 million SLC
in 2024
Pakistan rank
2nd
United Republic of Tanzania rank
2nd

R&D Environmental Protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time

  • Pakistan
  • United Republic of Tanzania
05.0k10.0k15.0k200120122024

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 13,509 million SLC against 845 million SLC in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 12,664 million SLC.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 16.0 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2003 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Pakistan ranks 2nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd of 101 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 0 million SLC 0 million SLC 0 million SLC
2010s 1,325 million SLC 868.08 million SLC 456.92 million SLC Pakistan
2020s 7,377 million SLC 281.67 million SLC 7,096 million SLC Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher r&d environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Pakistan or United Republic of Tanzania?
Pakistan, at 13,509 million SLC against 845 million SLC in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2024.
What is the difference in r&d environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Pakistan and United Republic of Tanzania?
12,664 million SLC, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and United Republic of Tanzania?
9 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
How do Pakistan and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for r&d environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
Pakistan ranks 2nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd of 101 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as R&D Environmental Protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs United Republic of Tanzania: R&D Environmental Protection (central government expenditure) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/r-and-d-environmental-protection-central-government-expenditure-value-standard-local/pakistan/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/r-and-d-environmental-protection-central-government-expenditure-value-standard-local/pakistan/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Pakistan vs United Republic of Tanzania: R&D Environmental Protection (central government expenditure) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
R&D Environmental Protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
108 places, 1,630 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.