Guinea-Bissau vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: R&D Environmental Protection (central government expenditure) — Value

Guinea-Bissau
1,125 million SLC
in 2015
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
1,293 million SLC
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
13th
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
11th

R&D Environmental Protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
02505007501.0k1.2k200120122023

How they compare

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland currently reports 1,293 million SLC against 1,125 million SLC in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 168 million SLC.

That makes United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 13th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 11th of 101 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
2000s 619.51 million SLC 548 million SLC 71.51 million SLC Guinea-Bissau
2010s 491.5 million SLC 670.17 million SLC 178.66 million SLC United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher r&d environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Guinea-Bissau or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, at 1,293 million SLC against 1,125 million SLC in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in r&d environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Guinea-Bissau and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
168 million SLC, with United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2015.
How do Guinea-Bissau and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for r&d environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 13th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 11th of 101 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as R&D Environmental Protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: R&D Environmental Protection (central government expenditure) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/r-and-d-environmental-protection-central-government-expenditure-value-standard-local/guinea-bissau/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/r-and-d-environmental-protection-central-government-expenditure-value-standard-local/guinea-bissau/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/">Guinea-Bissau vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: R&D Environmental Protection (central government expenditure) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
R&D Environmental Protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
108 places, 1,630 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.