Cabo Verde vs United Republic of Tanzania: R&D Environmental Protection (central government expenditure) — Value
R&D Environmental Protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time
- Cabo Verde
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 845 million SLC against 363.05 million SLC in Cabo Verde, a difference of 481.95 million SLC.
That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 2.3 times Cabo Verde's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd of 2 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cabo Verde averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 186.51 million SLC | 542.55 million SLC | 356.04 million SLC | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 2020s | 334.74 million SLC | 0 million SLC | 334.74 million SLC | Cabo Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher r&d environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Cabo Verde or United Republic of Tanzania?
- United Republic of Tanzania, at 845 million SLC against 363.05 million SLC in Cabo Verde as of 2024.
- What is the difference in r&d environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Cabo Verde and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 481.95 million SLC, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for r&d environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
- Cabo Verde ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd of 2 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as R&D Environmental Protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.