Angola vs Rwanda: R&D Environmental Protection (central government expenditure) — Value
R&D Environmental Protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time
- Angola
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 8,265 million SLC against 4,539 million SLC in Angola, a difference of 3,726 million SLC.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.8 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Rwanda ahead.
Angola ranks 6th and Rwanda ranks 3rd of 101 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 478.07 million SLC | 2,755 million SLC | 2,277 million SLC | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 2,847 million SLC | 3,464 million SLC | 617.03 million SLC | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher r&d environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Angola or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 8,265 million SLC against 4,539 million SLC in Angola as of 2024.
- What is the difference in r&d environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Angola and Rwanda?
- 3,726 million SLC, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Rwanda?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Rwanda rank globally for r&d environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
- Angola ranks 6th and Rwanda ranks 3rd of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as R&D Environmental Protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.