Australia vs France: R&D Environmental Protection, Capital (central government)
R&D Environmental Protection, Capital (central government) over time
- Australia
- France
How they compare
France currently reports 339 million SLC against 190 million SLC in Australia, a difference of 149 million SLC.
That makes France's figure about 1.8 times Australia's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, France has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 10th and France ranks 7th of 47 countries.
France has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | France | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 154 million SLC | 405.5 million SLC | 251.5 million SLC | France |
| 2020s | 137.75 million SLC | 315 million SLC | 177.25 million SLC | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher r&d environmental protection, capital (central government), Australia or France?
- France, at 339 million SLC against 190 million SLC in Australia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in r&d environmental protection, capital (central government) between Australia and France?
- 149 million SLC, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and France?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Australia and France rank globally for r&d environmental protection, capital (central government)?
- Australia ranks 10th and France ranks 7th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as R&D Environmental Protection, Capital (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.