Congo vs Pitcairn: Proportion tariff lines applied to imports from ldcs
Congo
47.3
in 2024
Pitcairn
47.11
in 2024
Congo rank
187th
Pitcairn rank
188th
Proportion tariff lines applied to imports from ldcs over time
- Congo
- Pitcairn
How they compare
Congo currently reports 47.3 against 47.11 in Pitcairn, a difference of 0.19.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 187th and Pitcairn ranks 188th of 230 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Pitcairn | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.49 | 64 | 0.49 | Congo |
| 2010s | 54.8 | 50.18 | 4.62 | Congo |
| 2020s | 43.5 | 42.87 | 0.634 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion tariff lines applied to imports from ldcs, Congo or Pitcairn?
- Congo, at 47.3 against 47.11 in Pitcairn as of 2024.
- What is the difference in proportion tariff lines applied to imports from ldcs between Congo and Pitcairn?
- 0.19, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Pitcairn?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Pitcairn rank globally for proportion tariff lines applied to imports from ldcs?
- Congo ranks 187th and Pitcairn ranks 188th of 230 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Proportion tariff lines applied to imports from ldcs. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.