Aruba vs Maldives: Proportion tariff lines applied to imports from ldcs
Aruba
54.43
in 2023
Maldives
54.07
in 2023
Aruba rank
167th
Maldives rank
168th
Proportion tariff lines applied to imports from ldcs over time
- Aruba
- Maldives
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 54.43 against 54.07 in Maldives, a difference of 0.36.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Maldives ahead.
Aruba ranks 167th and Maldives ranks 168th of 221 countries.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.01 | 42.52 | 12.51 | Maldives |
| 2010s | 34.07 | 52.89 | 18.82 | Maldives |
| 2020s | 45.21 | 54.27 | 9.06 | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion tariff lines applied to imports from ldcs, Aruba or Maldives?
- Aruba, at 54.43 against 54.07 in Maldives as of 2023.
- What is the difference in proportion tariff lines applied to imports from ldcs between Aruba and Maldives?
- 0.36, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Maldives?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Maldives rank globally for proportion tariff lines applied to imports from ldcs?
- Aruba ranks 167th and Maldives ranks 168th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Proportion tariff lines applied to imports from ldcs. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.