Rwanda vs Sweden: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Rwanda
0.0%
in 2021
Sweden
0.0%
in 2021
Rwanda rank
41st
Sweden rank
41st
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- Rwanda
- Sweden
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Sweden, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 41st and Sweden ranks 41st of 57 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 58.8% | 0.5% | 58.3% | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Rwanda or Sweden?
- Rwanda, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Sweden as of 2021.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Rwanda and Sweden?
- 0.0%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sweden?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Rwanda and Sweden rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- Rwanda ranks 41st and Sweden ranks 41st of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.