Romania vs Tunisia: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Romania
0.0%
in 2021
Tunisia
0.0%
in 2021
Romania rank
47th
Tunisia rank
47th
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- Romania
- Tunisia
How they compare
Romania currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Romania ahead.
Romania ranks 47th and Tunisia ranks 47th of 57 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.1% | Romania |
| 2020s | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.2% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Romania or Tunisia?
- Romania, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Tunisia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Romania and Tunisia?
- 0.0%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Tunisia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Romania and Tunisia rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- Romania ranks 47th and Tunisia ranks 47th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.