Romania vs South Africa: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Romania
0.0%
in 2021
South Africa
0.0%
in 2021
Romania rank
47th
South Africa rank
47th
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- Romania
- South Africa
How they compare
Romania currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in South Africa, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2016 it was South Africa ahead.
Romania ranks 47th and South Africa ranks 47th of 57 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.2% | 2.5% | 2.3% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 0.3% | 0.6% | 0.3% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Romania or South Africa?
- Romania, at 0.0% against 0.0% in South Africa as of 2021.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Romania and South Africa?
- 0.0%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Romania and South Africa rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- Romania ranks 47th and South Africa ranks 47th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.