Philippines vs Tunisia: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Philippines
0.0%
in 2021
Tunisia
0.0%
in 2021
Philippines rank
44th
Tunisia rank
47th
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- Philippines
- Tunisia
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Philippines's figure about 2.0 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Tunisia ahead.
Philippines ranks 44th and Tunisia ranks 47th of 57 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.4% | 0.0% | 1.4% | Philippines |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Philippines or Tunisia?
- Philippines, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Tunisia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Philippines and Tunisia?
- 0.0%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Tunisia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Philippines and Tunisia rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- Philippines ranks 44th and Tunisia ranks 47th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.