Philippines vs Sweden: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Philippines
0.0%
in 2021
Sweden
0.0%
in 2021
Philippines rank
44th
Sweden rank
41st
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- Philippines
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Philippines, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.5 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Sweden ahead.
Philippines ranks 44th and Sweden ranks 41st of 57 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.4% | 0.5% | 0.9% | Philippines |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.7% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Philippines or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Philippines as of 2021.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Philippines and Sweden?
- 0.0%, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Sweden?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Philippines and Sweden rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- Philippines ranks 44th and Sweden ranks 41st of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.