Philippines vs South Africa: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Philippines
0.0%
in 2021
South Africa
0.0%
in 2021
Philippines rank
44th
South Africa rank
47th
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- Philippines
- South Africa
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in South Africa, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Philippines's figure about 2.0 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2016 it was South Africa ahead.
Philippines ranks 44th and South Africa ranks 47th of 57 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.4% | 2.5% | 1.1% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.5% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Philippines or South Africa?
- Philippines, at 0.0% against 0.0% in South Africa as of 2021.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Philippines and South Africa?
- 0.0%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Philippines and South Africa rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- Philippines ranks 44th and South Africa ranks 47th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.