Peru vs Philippines: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Peru
0.0%
in 2021
Philippines
0.0%
in 2021
Peru rank
47th
Philippines rank
44th
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- Peru
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Peru, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Philippines's figure about 2.0 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Philippines ahead.
Peru ranks 47th and Philippines ranks 44th of 57 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | Philippines |
| 2020s | 1.0% | 0.0% | 1.0% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Peru or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Peru as of 2021.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Peru and Philippines?
- 0.0%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Philippines?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Peru and Philippines rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- Peru ranks 47th and Philippines ranks 44th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.