Norway vs Philippines: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Norway
0.0%
in 2021
Philippines
0.0%
in 2021
Norway rank
47th
Philippines rank
44th
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- Norway
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Norway, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Philippines's figure about 2.0 times Norway's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Norway ahead.
Norway ranks 47th and Philippines ranks 44th of 57 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.2% | 1.4% | 1.2% | Philippines |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Norway or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Norway as of 2021.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Norway and Philippines?
- 0.0%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Philippines?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Norway and Philippines rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- Norway ranks 47th and Philippines ranks 44th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.