New Zealand vs Poland: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
New Zealand
0.3%
in 2021
Poland
0.3%
in 2021
New Zealand rank
27th
Poland rank
26th
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- New Zealand
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 0.3% against 0.3% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2016 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 27th and Poland ranks 26th of 57 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 7.2% | 0.7% | 6.6% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 1.4% | 0.6% | 0.8% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, New Zealand or Poland?
- Poland, at 0.3% against 0.3% in New Zealand as of 2021.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between New Zealand and Poland?
- 0.0%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do New Zealand and Poland rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- New Zealand ranks 27th and Poland ranks 26th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.