Malaysia vs Spain: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Malaysia
0.1%
in 2021
Spain
0.1%
in 2021
Malaysia rank
35th
Spain rank
32nd
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- Malaysia
- Spain
How they compare
Spain currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in Malaysia, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Spain's figure about 1.4 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 35th and Spain ranks 32nd of 57 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.1% | 1.1% | 1.0% | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 7.9% | 0.9% | 7.1% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Malaysia or Spain?
- Spain, at 0.1% against 0.1% in Malaysia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Malaysia and Spain?
- 0.0%, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Spain?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Malaysia and Spain rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- Malaysia ranks 35th and Spain ranks 32nd of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.