Malawi vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked

Malawi
9.4%
in 2021
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
1.3%
in 2021
Malawi rank
11th
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
14th

Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time

  • Malawi
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
0102030201620182021

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 9.4% against 1.3% in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 8.1%.

That makes Malawi's figure about 7.4 times United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Malawi ahead.

Malawi ranks 11th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 14th of 57 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
2010s 16.3% 2.6% 13.7% Malawi
2020s 11.2% 2.2% 9.0% Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Malawi or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
Malawi, at 9.4% against 1.3% in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2021.
What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Malawi and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
8.1%, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2021.
How do Malawi and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
Malawi ranks 11th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 14th of 57 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-traded-wildlife-that-was-poached-or-illicitly-trafficked/malawi/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-traded-wildlife-that-was-poached-or-illicitly-trafficked/malawi/united-kingdom/">Malawi vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
58 places, 326 data points, 2016–2021
Last refreshed