Madagascar vs Sweden: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Madagascar
0.0%
in 2020
Sweden
0.0%
in 2021
Madagascar rank
41st
Sweden rank
41st
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- Madagascar
- Sweden
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Sweden, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Sweden ahead.
Madagascar ranks 41st and Sweden ranks 41st of 57 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.2% | 0.5% | 3.7% | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Madagascar or Sweden?
- Madagascar, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Sweden as of 2020.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Madagascar and Sweden?
- 0.0%, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Sweden?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2020.
- How do Madagascar and Sweden rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- Madagascar ranks 41st and Sweden ranks 41st of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.