Latvia vs Rwanda: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Latvia
0.0%
in 2021
Rwanda
0.0%
in 2021
Latvia rank
39th
Rwanda rank
41st
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- Latvia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.3 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Rwanda ahead.
Latvia ranks 39th and Rwanda ranks 41st of 57 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.2% | 58.8% | 57.6% | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Latvia or Rwanda?
- Latvia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Rwanda as of 2021.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Latvia and Rwanda?
- 0.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Rwanda?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Latvia and Rwanda rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- Latvia ranks 39th and Rwanda ranks 41st of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.