Latvia vs Madagascar: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Latvia
0.0%
in 2021
Madagascar
0.0%
in 2020
Latvia rank
39th
Madagascar rank
41st
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- Latvia
- Madagascar
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Madagascar, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.3 times Madagascar's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 39th and Madagascar ranks 41st of 57 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.2% | 4.2% | 3.0% | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.1% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Latvia or Madagascar?
- Latvia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Madagascar as of 2021.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Latvia and Madagascar?
- 0.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Madagascar?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2020.
- How do Latvia and Madagascar rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- Latvia ranks 39th and Madagascar ranks 41st of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.