Italy vs Latvia: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Italy
0.0%
in 2021
Latvia
0.0%
in 2021
Italy rank
39th
Latvia rank
39th
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- Italy
- Latvia
How they compare
Italy currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Latvia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Italy ranks 39th and Latvia ranks 39th of 57 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.2% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Italy or Latvia?
- Italy, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Latvia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Italy and Latvia?
- 0.0%, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Latvia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Italy and Latvia rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- Italy ranks 39th and Latvia ranks 39th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.