Guatemala vs United Arab Emirates: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Guatemala
0.2%
in 2021
United Arab Emirates
0.4%
in 2021
Guatemala rank
28th
United Arab Emirates rank
25th
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- Guatemala
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 0.4% against 0.2% in Guatemala, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes United Arab Emirates's figure about 1.6 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 28th and United Arab Emirates ranks 25th of 57 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 19.2% | 0.2% | 19.0% | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Guatemala or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 0.4% against 0.2% in Guatemala as of 2021.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Guatemala and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.2%, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and United Arab Emirates?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Guatemala and United Arab Emirates rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- Guatemala ranks 28th and United Arab Emirates ranks 25th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.