Guatemala vs New Zealand: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Guatemala
0.2%
in 2021
New Zealand
0.3%
in 2021
Guatemala rank
28th
New Zealand rank
27th
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- Guatemala
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0.3% against 0.2% in Guatemala, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 28th and New Zealand ranks 27th of 57 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 19.2% | 7.2% | 12.0% | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 0.3% | 1.4% | 1.1% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Guatemala or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 0.3% against 0.2% in Guatemala as of 2021.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Guatemala and New Zealand?
- 0.1%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and New Zealand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Guatemala and New Zealand rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- Guatemala ranks 28th and New Zealand ranks 27th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.