Estonia vs New Zealand: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Estonia
0.1%
in 2021
New Zealand
0.3%
in 2021
Estonia rank
30th
New Zealand rank
27th
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- Estonia
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0.3% against 0.1% in Estonia, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 2.1 times Estonia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 30th and New Zealand ranks 27th of 57 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.3% | 8.1% | 7.9% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 1.4% | 1.3% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Estonia or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 0.3% against 0.1% in Estonia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Estonia and New Zealand?
- 0.2%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and New Zealand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2021.
- How do Estonia and New Zealand rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- Estonia ranks 30th and New Zealand ranks 27th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.