El Salvador vs United Kingdom: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
El Salvador
5.7%
in 2021
United Kingdom
1.3%
in 2021
El Salvador rank
12th
United Kingdom rank
14th
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- El Salvador
- United Kingdom
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 5.7% against 1.3% in United Kingdom, a difference of 4.4%.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 4.5 times United Kingdom's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2017 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 12th and United Kingdom ranks 14th of 57 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10.2% | 2.6% | 7.6% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 3.2% | 2.2% | 1.0% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, El Salvador or United Kingdom?
- El Salvador, at 5.7% against 1.3% in United Kingdom as of 2021.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between El Salvador and United Kingdom?
- 4.4%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and United Kingdom?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2021.
- How do El Salvador and United Kingdom rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- El Salvador ranks 12th and United Kingdom ranks 14th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.