El Salvador vs Malawi: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
El Salvador
5.7%
in 2021
Malawi
9.4%
in 2021
El Salvador rank
12th
Malawi rank
11th
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- El Salvador
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 9.4% against 5.7% in El Salvador, a difference of 3.7%.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.6 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Malawi ahead.
El Salvador ranks 12th and Malawi ranks 11th of 57 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10.2% | 16.3% | 6.0% | Malawi |
| 2020s | 3.2% | 11.2% | 8.0% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, El Salvador or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 9.4% against 5.7% in El Salvador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between El Salvador and Malawi?
- 3.7%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Malawi?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2021.
- How do El Salvador and Malawi rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- El Salvador ranks 12th and Malawi ranks 11th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.