Dominican Republic vs Lithuania: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Dominican Republic
49.0%
in 2021
Lithuania
18.3%
in 2021
Dominican Republic rank
5th
Lithuania rank
7th
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- Dominican Republic
- Lithuania
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 49.0% against 18.3% in Lithuania, a difference of 30.7%.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 2.7 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 5th and Lithuania ranks 7th of 57 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 38.0% | 0.5% | 37.5% | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 28.3% | 55.2% | 26.9% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Dominican Republic or Lithuania?
- Dominican Republic, at 49.0% against 18.3% in Lithuania as of 2021.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Dominican Republic and Lithuania?
- 30.7%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Lithuania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Lithuania rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- Dominican Republic ranks 5th and Lithuania ranks 7th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.