Croatia vs Nigeria: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Croatia
51.9%
in 2021
Nigeria
91.6%
in 2021
Croatia rank
3rd
Nigeria rank
2nd
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- Croatia
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 91.6% against 51.9% in Croatia, a difference of 39.7%.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.8 times Croatia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Nigeria has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 3rd and Nigeria ranks 2nd of 57 countries.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 19.4% | 73.4% | 54.0% | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 51.9% | 91.6% | 39.8% | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Croatia or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 91.6% against 51.9% in Croatia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Croatia and Nigeria?
- 39.7%, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Nigeria?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Croatia and Nigeria rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- Croatia ranks 3rd and Nigeria ranks 2nd of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.