Cote d'Ivoire vs Slovakia: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Cote d'Ivoire
0.1%
in 2020
Slovakia
0.1%
in 2020
Cote d'Ivoire rank
33rd
Slovakia rank
31st
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Slovakia's figure about 1.4 times Cote d'Ivoire's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 33rd and Slovakia ranks 31st of 57 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Slovakia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10.9% | 1.0% | 9.9% | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Cote d'Ivoire or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 0.1% against 0.1% in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2020.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Cote d'Ivoire and Slovakia?
- 0.0%, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Slovakia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2020.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Slovakia rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 33rd and Slovakia ranks 31st of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.