Côte d'Ivoire vs Malaysia: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Côte d'Ivoire
0.1%
in 2020
Malaysia
0.1%
in 2021
Côte d'Ivoire rank
33rd
Malaysia rank
35th
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Malaysia
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in Malaysia, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Côte d'Ivoire's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 33rd and Malaysia ranks 35th of 57 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10.9% | 2.1% | 8.9% | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 15.8% | 15.7% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Côte d'Ivoire or Malaysia?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 0.1% against 0.1% in Malaysia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Côte d'Ivoire and Malaysia?
- 0.0%, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Malaysia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2020.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Malaysia rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 33rd and Malaysia ranks 35th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.