Austria vs Sweden: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Austria
0.1%
in 2021
Sweden
0.0%
in 2021
Austria rank
38th
Sweden rank
41st
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- Austria
- Sweden
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0.1% against 0.0% in Sweden, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.7 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Sweden ahead.
Austria ranks 38th and Sweden ranks 41st of 57 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.5% | 0.3% | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 0.7% | 0.6% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Austria or Sweden?
- Austria, at 0.1% against 0.0% in Sweden as of 2021.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Austria and Sweden?
- 0.1%, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Sweden?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Austria and Sweden rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- Austria ranks 38th and Sweden ranks 41st of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.