Austria vs Malaysia: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Austria
0.1%
in 2021
Malaysia
0.1%
in 2021
Austria rank
38th
Malaysia rank
35th
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- Austria
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in Austria, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.4 times Austria's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 38th and Malaysia ranks 35th of 57 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.1% | 2.1% | 1.9% | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 7.9% | 7.8% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Austria or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 0.1% against 0.1% in Austria as of 2021.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Austria and Malaysia?
- 0.0%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Malaysia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Austria and Malaysia rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- Austria ranks 38th and Malaysia ranks 35th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.