Aruba vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked

Aruba
0.9%
in 2021
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
1.1%
in 2021
Aruba rank
19th
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
16th

Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time

  • Aruba
  • Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
02.557.51012.5201620182021

How they compare

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) currently reports 1.1% against 0.9% in Aruba, a difference of 0.2%.

That makes Netherlands (Kingdom of the)'s figure about 1.3 times Aruba's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 19th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 16th of 57 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Difference Ahead
2010s 1.1% 6.2% 5.0% Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2020s 1.8% 0.7% 1.1% Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Aruba or Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
Netherlands (Kingdom of the), at 1.1% against 0.9% in Aruba as of 2021.
What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Aruba and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
0.2%, with Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
How do Aruba and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
Aruba ranks 19th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 16th of 57 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-traded-wildlife-that-was-poached-or-illicitly-trafficked/aruba/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-traded-wildlife-that-was-poached-or-illicitly-trafficked/aruba/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/">Aruba vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
58 places, 326 data points, 2016–2021
Last refreshed