Aruba vs Israel: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Aruba
0.9%
in 2021
Israel
1.0%
in 2021
Aruba rank
19th
Israel rank
18th
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- Aruba
- Israel
How they compare
Israel currently reports 1.0% against 0.9% in Aruba, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.2 times Aruba's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 19th and Israel ranks 18th of 57 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4% | 0.1% | 0.3% | Aruba |
| 2020s | 1.8% | 0.7% | 1.1% | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Aruba or Israel?
- Israel, at 1.0% against 0.9% in Aruba as of 2021.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Aruba and Israel?
- 0.1%, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Israel?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2021.
- How do Aruba and Israel rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- Aruba ranks 19th and Israel ranks 18th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.